New, New TardisBuilders!
Started by the doctor who2, May 17, 2013, 09:45 pm
Quote from: Kingpin on Aug 30, 2013, 10:54 pmQuote from: the doctor who2 on Aug 30, 2013, 08:20 pmIf you do see any problems let me know and i can adjust it Again i apologies and thank you all for being patient A few things I noticed about the above symbol:The small circle embedded in the rings around the rim a around the 5 'o clock mark: There should be a gap between the outside of the embedded circle and the innermost ring of the overall design. The ring within this small circle should probably be a little larger, and a little thicker.The small circle above the slanted line that's straddling the innermost ring of the overall design, it looks like it might need shifting a little bit so that the middle of the small circle would be bisected by the larger ring.
Quote from: the doctor who2 on Aug 30, 2013, 08:20 pmIf you do see any problems let me know and i can adjust it Again i apologies and thank you all for being patient
Quote from: Kingpin on Aug 31, 2013, 10:22 pmI think, if you enlarge all of the items within the thick circle (including the circle itself) just a little bit, reducing the gap between the thick circle and thicker hexagon, then you're onto a winner.
Quote from: galacticprobe on Sep 03, 2013, 04:40 amI agree with Kingpin. This one's nailed down! Great work, the doctor who2! It's very much appreciated and will be a great addition for the reference section when completed.Just curious, but in what order are you working on these: easiest to hardest; vice-versa; or in "numerical" order, as in starting with one symbol and then doing the next symbol to its right - or left - and working your way around the whirligig?Dino.
Quote from: temporal engineer on Sep 03, 2013, 09:33 pmIt think the area I've shaded green could do with making bigger by nudging the filled symbol up a bit:No message is associated with this attachment.Keep up the good... no brilliant... work!
Quote from: galacticprobe on Sep 04, 2013, 03:48 amI think temporal engineer is right, looking at this one again. That point of the filled-in "circlet" that temporal is highlighting shouldn't be touching that arc; it should be "hovering" above, and pointing to the right corner of the "flat" where the "dip" between the two other arcs is (see yellow arrow):(I guess it pays - or not - to have several dozen eyes looking things like this over!)Dino.